
Future of College Degrees
Thanks AI *
(* Entry Level Cancelled)
Somewhere right now a 22-year-old is sitting with a diploma, a LinkedIn profile, and a mounting suspicion that something went sideways.
Nobody told them. The door didn’t slam. There was no announcement. The entry-level job that was supposed to be the first rung — the one that was always there, the one their older cousin got, the one the guidance counselor referenced with complete confidence — just got quieter. Then quieter. Then it pretty much stopped answering.
A recent Anthropic study tracked job-finding rates for workers aged 22 to 25 in AI-exposed occupations. Since ChatGPT launched in late 2022, those rates dropped about 14%. Not because people got fired. Because the openings stopped opening. The door didn’t close dramatically. The janitor locked it and walked away.
Nobody mentioned that at graduation.
College made a straightforward promise. Study the field. Learn the tools. Show up credentialed and get your shot at the entry-level role where you’d actually learn to do the work.
The degree was never really about knowledge. It was about the on-ramp. You paid for the right to start. The paper was the ticket.
AI didn’t argue with the knowledge. It just looked at the on-ramp and said, I can handle that part. The research, the drafting, the analysis formatting, the first-pass everything that used to require a warm body in a junior chair — covered. Thanks for the ticket. The seat’s been reassigned.
The diploma is still real. The promise attached to it is having a moment.
Here’s what didn’t make the brochure. The future doesn’t need people who can describe a hammer. It needs people who know which hammer, and when, and what happens if you grab the wrong one.
Four years of studying hammers worked when drawing them was the job. AI draws them now. Faster, cheaper, available at 2am without a benefits package. What it cannot do is walk onto a jobsite, read the situation, and know that this particular problem doesn’t actually need a hammer at all.
That’s judgment. That’s the thing the diploma was supposed to eventually produce — after the entry-level job, after the first few years of actual work, after someone more experienced watched you make mistakes and corrected them. The on-ramp was where judgment got built. AI absorbed the on-ramp. The judgment pipeline has a gap in it now and nobody has figured out how to fill it.
The paper was doing a specific job. Proof of completion — a reliable signal that you showed up, finished something, and could handle the entry-level work. The employer who used to hire a junior analyst to produce first drafts now has a tool that does it at 11pm on a Sunday without a benefits package. Whether that analyst has a degree has become less interesting than whether they can do something the tool can’t.
The degree still exists. The job it used to guarantee is working things out.
The class of 2026 didn’t get cheated exactly. They got caught in the gap between the world that designed the credential and the world that showed up while they were earning it.
What comes next — how to direct AI, how to catch what it gets wrong, how to ask the question the tool can’t generate — that’s the new on-ramp.
College taught you to draw the hammer. Congratulations. AI draws them now.
The job is knowing what to build. Hopefully college will adapt to teaching the kids that.
Editor’s Note: In grad school my profs said they were going to teach me to use tools, and figure out which one for when. That has made all the difference.


Documenting AI absurdity isn’t just about reading articles—it’s about commiserating, laughing, and eye-rolling together. Connect with us and fellow logic-free observers to share your own AI mishaps and help build the definitive record of human-AI comedy.
Thanks for being part of the fun. Sharing helps keep the laughs coming!