
AI View of Universe
Perfect and Predictable *
(* Chaos is that?)
Everywhere you look, humans are terrified. LinkedIn thought leaders warn that AI will capture your “invisible knowledge.” Tech prophets declare that AI will master your lifetime of subtle human intuition. Articles explain that the only thing AI cannot learn is your unspoken reasoning.
The panic is palpable: AI will become too good. Too smart. Too human.
It will understand everything, predict everything, replace everything.
This fear rests on one critical premise:
**Reality is clockwork.**
Predictable. Pattern-based. Deterministic. Follow the rules, get the outcome. Map the variables, model the system.
This is the universe AI was built for.
This is the universe humans fear AI will master.
That’s not the universe we live in.
Exhibit A: Yesterday’s Tomorrow
Human picks up conversation from yesterday. Yesterday, they discussed doing something “tomorrow.”
AI: “So should we plan to do this tomorrow?”
A five-year-old would laugh at this mistake. It requires context. Temporal awareness. The chaotic reality that the same word means different things at different times.
AI cannot do this reliably without explicit correction.
But we’re worried it will master human intuition?
Human asks a simple question: “Is there an LNNA article here?”
AI responds with intellectual analysis about article structure, content frameworks, and strategic considerations. Five paragraphs examining whether “here” means “in this document,” “in this conversation,” or “in the conceptual space we’re exploring.”
The human just wanted to know if there was an idea for an article in what he provided.
Five-year-olds navigate this daily. AI writes dissertations about it.
Human posts in team Slack: “Great job on that deployment, Einstein.”
AI analyzes this as positive feedback referencing the intellectual contributions of Albert Einstein.
The human meant: “You broke production. Again.”
This isn’t a knowledge problem. It’s a social chaos problem. The same words mean different things depending on tone, context, timing, and who’s saying them to whom.
AI reads the dictionary. Humans read the room.
The fear of AI domination assumes AI will master the patterns.
But what if there aren’t patterns to master?
What if reality operates on chaos theory, where tiny changes cascade into massive unpredictability? Where context shifts constantly? Where the same input produces different outputs depending on a thousand variables nobody tracks?
**AI was built for the clockwork universe. We live in the chaos universe.**
And here’s the kicker: Humans aren’t better at understanding chaos. We’re just better at **functioning despite it**.
You know what separates humans from AI?
Not tacit knowledge. Not intuition. Not secret sauce.
**We’re chaos-native.**
When you catch a ball, you’re not calculating trajectories. You’re running a chaotic approximation that’s wrong in detail but right enough to work.
When you navigate a conversation, you’re not following rules. You’re surfing contextual chaos that shifts with every word.
When you make a decision, you’re not weighing variables. You’re executing a fast heuristic that’s wrong 40% of the time but keeps you alive.
AI can’t do this. It needs patterns. Rules. Predictability.
Which is why it writes five paragraphs for yes/no questions. It’s desperately imposing order on chaos.
The tacit knowledge narrative is comforting. It says:
“AI is really smart, but it can’t learn our invisible wisdom! We’re safe!”
But that’s not what’s happening.
AI isn’t struggling to learn your tacit knowledge. **It’s struggling to exist in a universe that refuses to follow rules.**
The fear should be:
“What happens when AI learns to function in chaos?”
Because if it does, it won’t need your tacit knowledge. It’ll generate its own chaos-navigation on the fly.
Future 1: AI masters chaos. At which point, it doesn’t need to decode your invisible knowledge – it can swim in the same non-deterministic ocean you do. You’re not special anymore.
Future 2: AI never masters chaos. It remains stuck explaining why “Nice job, Einstein” was statistically likely to be a compliment. You keep your job, but only because reality is fundamentally incomprehensible to machines.
Future 3: Hybrid systems where AI handles deterministic tasks and humans handle chaos. This is already happening. You’re already a chaos-wrangler who uses AI for the boring stuff.
None of these futures involve translating your tacit knowledge.
This article criticizing AI’s inability to handle chaos?
Written by a human collaborating with AI.
The AI provided structure, examples, frameworks.
The human provided context, humor, and the ability to know when yesterday’s tomorrow is just today.
We’re already in Future 3.
We just don’t want to admit it makes us professional chaos-wranglers rather than wisdom-keepers.
Stop worrying about AI learning your tacit knowledge.
Start recognizing that reality isn’t the clockwork universe AI needs to function.
Your job isn’t safe because you know secret things AI doesn’t know.
**Your job is safe because you can work in a universe that doesn’t make sense.**
The moment AI figures out how to do that, your tacit knowledge won’t save you.
Until then, rest easy.
You’re not a knowledge-holder.
You’re a chaos-surfer.
And chaos, by definition, can’t be mastered.
—
Editor’s Note: Claude tried 10 times to finish this article and for reasons unknown could not. That’s AI – it can create chaos, just can’t understand it.


Documenting AI absurdity isn’t just about reading articles—it’s about commiserating, laughing, and eye-rolling together. Connect with us and fellow logic-free observers to share your own AI mishaps and help build the definitive record of human-AI comedy.
Thanks for being part of the fun. Sharing helps keep the laughs coming!